
How to Design a Successful Feasibility Study in Clinical Trials
Jul 18
3 min read

A feasibility study is one of the most crucial pre-trial planning tools in clinical research. It determines whether a proposed clinical trial is practical, scientifically sound, financially viable, and ethically justified. Unfortunately, many sponsors and research teams underestimate its power—resulting in delayed site activations, under-enrollment, protocol amendments, and, ultimately, trial failure.
This guide explains how to design a successful feasibility study, emphasizing best practices, strategic objectives, and real-world implementation. Based on insights from The Ultimate Guide to Clinical Trials: A Complete Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, this blog post supports the mission of clinicaltrialshandbook.com: to equip clinical trial professionals with tools for precision, compliance, and performance.
What Is a Feasibility Study in Clinical Trials?
A clinical trial feasibility study is a structured assessment conducted before launching a trial. Its goal is to evaluate whether the proposed study can be executed successfully given the protocol requirements, available patient population, regulatory environment, budget, and operational resources.
A feasibility study should assess:
Protocol complexity
Site capability and interest
Investigator availability
Patient access and eligibility
Competing studies
Logistics and timelines
Budget alignment
A well-executed feasibility study saves time, reduces risk, and improves study performance.
Why Feasibility Studies Matter
Feasibility studies are the bridge between concept and execution. They reduce uncertainty and help sponsors and CROs make informed go/no-go decisions.
Benefits include:
Identifying patient recruitment barriers early
Preventing unrealistic timelines and budgets
Selecting high-performing research sites
Detecting regulatory and ethical approval challenges
Optimizing protocol design before IRB submission
According to industry benchmarks, 80% of clinical trials fail to meet enrollment targets on time. Most of these failures could have been predicted—and mitigated—by a proper feasibility study.
Key Components of a Feasibility Study
A successful feasibility study includes several interrelated assessments:
Scientific and Protocol Feasibility
Are the inclusion/exclusion criteria realistic?
Are endpoints measurable within the proposed timeline?
Is the intervention supported by preclinical/early phase data?
Are procedures overly invasive or burdensome?
Operational Feasibility
Can the sites manage the visit schedule, testing requirements, and data collection?
Do the sites have the necessary equipment and staff?
Are appropriate SOPs and quality assurance systems in place?
Regulatory and Ethical Feasibility
What is the IRB/EC turnaround time?
Are there country-specific regulatory hurdles?
Is the trial design in line with local GCP and data privacy regulations?
Financial Feasibility
Is the sponsor budget aligned with site cost expectations?
Are there pass-through costs, courier fees, or other hidden expenses?
Will sites be reimbursed in a timely manner?
Patient Access and Enrollment Feasibility
Does the site have access to the target patient population?
What are the predicted screen failure and dropout rates?
Are there competing trials in the same therapeutic area?
How to Conduct a Feasibility Study: Step-by-Step
Define Study Objectives and Scope
Clarify therapeutic area, phase, population, and geographic regions
Develop a Feasibility Questionnaire
Include questions on recruitment history, staffing, equipment, regulatory experience, and protocol-specific needs
Distribute Questionnaire to Target Sites
Engage with a select list of potential sites (use previous performance data where available)
Conduct Follow-Up Interviews
Schedule calls to clarify responses and assess site enthusiasm, experience, and communication style
Analyze and Score Responses
Use a scoring matrix to rank sites based on key performance indicators (KPIs) and risk
Validate with Site Data
Compare site claims with historical data (from CTMS, registries, or prior studies)
Generate a Feasibility Report
Summarize risks, opportunities, site recommendations, and next steps
Make Informed Go/No-Go and Site Selection Decisions
Tools and Technology for Feasibility Assessment
Modern platforms and software can streamline the feasibility process:
CTMS platforms (e.g., Veeva, Medidata, Oracle Clinical One)
Feasibility intelligence tools (e.g., Citeline, TrialScope, TriNetX)
Electronic feasibility surveys with automated scoring
Patient population analytics tools using EHR or claims data
Tip from My Book: Integrate feasibility tools early in your site identification workflow for optimal alignment with study timelines.
Common Mistakes in Feasibility Studies (And How to Avoid Them)
Relying on site enthusiasm over data
Ignoring competing studies
Using generic, one-size-fits-all questionnaires
Underestimating regulatory delays
Overlooking protocol design flaws
Failing to engage sites in realistic enrollment forecasting
Prevention Strategy:
Design tailored feasibility tools for each protocol and involve cross-functional stakeholders early—regulatory, medical, operational, and financial.
Conclusion: Feasibility is the Trial’s First Risk Filter
A well-designed feasibility study is not a luxury—it is a necessity. It aligns science with operational capability and ensures every trial is built on a solid, data-driven foundation. Designing and executing feasibility correctly reduces costly amendments, boosts enrollment success, and positions your study for regulatory approval.
As a clinical trial expert and author of The Ultimate Guide to Clinical Trials, I provide detailed feasibility checklists, site evaluation templates, and scorecard frameworks that can transform your planning process. For those seeking to reduce risk and increase trial execution confidence, a robust feasibility study is your starting line.